Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) governed by C.F.R. § 36.302(c)(4) allows service animals to be off-leash when specifically trained to perform tasks that require distance from their handler.
28 C.F.R. § 36.302(c)(4) states:
A service animal shall be under the control of its handler. A service animal shall have a harness, leash, or other tether, unless either the handler is unable because of a disability to use a harness, leash, or other tether, or the use of a harness, leash, or other tether would interfere with the service animal's safe, effective performance of work or tasks, in which case the service animal must be otherwise under the handler's control (e.g., voice control, signals, or other effective means).
There is no federal requirement that a service animal be continuously leashed when performing trained work that requires distance.
Off-leash service work can include:
If the handler can direct the dog, stop the dog, and modify the dog’s behavior through voice or signal commands, the animal is under control within the meaning of § 36.302(c)(4).
“Under control” is not defined as constant physical restraint. The legal standard is whether the handler maintains effective control of the animal’s behavior while it is working.
Off-leash positioning during trained task performance does not, by itself, constitute loss of control.
The only circumstance in which “control” becomes grounds for removal is where the animal is out of control and the handler does not take effective action to control it, as set forth in 28 C.F.R. § 36.302(c)(2).
Federal law does not require a service animal to be silent. A single bark, or barking that stops when the handler issues a command, does not constitute loss of control.
Under 28 C.F.R. § 36.302(c)(4), the governing legal requirement is that the service animal remain under the handler’s control. Service animals may vocalize in response to environmental stimuli or while performing trained alert work and responsiveness to handler commands that stop the barking satisfies the “under control” requirement of § 36.302(c)(4).
The U.S. DOJ’s supplementary information indicates that “under control” does not mean “does not bark.” The DOJ explains that the appropriateness can be assessed by reviewing how a public accommodation addresses comparable situations where the environment contains other types of noise, such as loud cheering or a child crying.
Accordingly, barking is evaluated as a control issue. Isolated/brief vocalization does not, by itself, establish lack of control where the handler takes effective action to not allow repeated barking.
Under 28 C.F.R. § 36.302(c)(2), a public accommodation may ask an individual with a disability to remove a service animal from the premises only if:
If not obvious, staff may ask only:
Staff may not:
A blanket “all service dogs must be leashed at all times” policy conflicts with 28 C.F.R. § 36.302(c)(4). Federal law preempts venue policy.
This dog will remain under continuous handler control. Off-leash positioning will occur only when required for trained task performance.
28 C.F.R. § 36.302(c)
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-I/part-36/subpart-C/section-36.302
DOJ Supplementary Information
https://www.ada.gov/assets/pdfs/title-iii-2010-regulations.pdf